LI Zhi-chao, DUAN Yu-feng, WANG Yun-jun, HUANG Zhi-jun, MENG Su-li, SHEN Jie-zhong. Mercury removal by ESP and WFGD in a 300 MW coal-fired power plant[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2013, 41(04): 491-498.
Citation: LI Zhi-chao, DUAN Yu-feng, WANG Yun-jun, HUANG Zhi-jun, MENG Su-li, SHEN Jie-zhong. Mercury removal by ESP and WFGD in a 300 MW coal-fired power plant[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2013, 41(04): 491-498.

Mercury removal by ESP and WFGD in a 300 MW coal-fired power plant

  • The Ontario Hydro Method (OHM) was used to sample and analyze the mercury concentration in flue gas before and after ESP and WFGD in a 300 MW power plant. Mercury content in coal, bottom slag, fly ash of ESP, adsorbent (limestone) and desulfurization product (gypsum) was detected by DMA80. Mercury mass balance was calculated based on the online measurements through the boiler system. Factors affecting the distribution, transformation and removal of mercury in flue gas were discussed. The results show that the gaseous mercury (Hg0 and Hg2+) in flue gas accounts for about 95% of total mercury, while mercury in the bottom ash can be neglected. More than 95% of Hgp and a little gaseous phase mercury (Hg0 and Hg2+)were removed by ESP. The efficiencies to remove total mercury by ESP range from 12.77% to 17.38%. A removal efficiency for Hg2+(g) reaches up to 79.93%~90.53% by WFGD, however, the content of Hg0 after WFGD increases because part of oxidized mercury is reduced to elemental mercury during WFGD. The efficiencies to remove total mercury by WFGD range from 9.68% to 29.36%. ESP and WFGD can remove all of the Hgp and a majority of Hg2+ with a total mercury removal efficiency of 25.38%~38.38%. In general, the demercuration in the conventional devices of ESP and WFGD is not high, which perhaps is owing to the lower concentration of Cl in feed coal.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return