TG analysis of coal direct liquefaction residue and its solvent extracts
-
摘要: 利用热天平考察了神华和胜利两种典型中国煤直接液化残渣及其萃取产物的失重曲线。实验表明,神华残渣和胜利残渣的轻质组分含量相近,其失重率也相近,但轻质组分组成不同使得失重过程并不一致 。升温速率增加,热解最大失重速率增加,最大失重速率温度升高。以残渣各组分失重曲线拟合得到的残渣失重曲线可近似表示残渣的失重曲线。动力学分析表明,由实验数据拟合的活化能和指前因子计算得到的失重曲线,与实际实验得到的失重曲线较为一致。液化残渣在低温区失重率很高,而且这部分失重产物可以通过溶剂萃取的方式得到。Abstract: Pyrolysis of two typical Chinese coal liquefaction residues (Shenhua and Shengli) and their solvent extracts was carried out by TG. The results show that Shenhua and Shengli residue contain similar content of light component, and their weight losses in TGA are similar. However, the different composition of light component in the two residues leads to their difference in TG curves. As increasing of heating rate, the maximum weight loss rate and its corresponding temperature increase. The calculated weight loss calculated from the constitutes is approximately the actual value of the residue. From the kinetic analysis, it is found that the weight loss calculated by the experimental E and k0 agree well with that obtained from the experiment. The weight loss is mainly caused by evaporation of volatile matter which can be extracted by solvent.
-
Key words:
- coal direct liquefaction /
- residue /
- thermogravimetric analysis /
- extract /
- activation energy /
- frequency factor
-
刘振宇. 煤直接液化技术发展的化学脉络及化学工程挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2010, 29(2): 193-197. (LIU Zhen-yu. Principal chemistry and chemical engineering challenges in direct coal liquefaction technology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2010, 29(2): 193-197.) 李军, 杨建丽, 刘振宇. 煤直接液化残渣的热解特性研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2010, 38(4): 385-390. (LI Jun, YANG Jian-li, LIU Zhen-yu. Pyrolysis behavior of direct coal liquefaction residues[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2010, 38(4): 385-390. ) 楚希杰, 李文, 白宗庆, 李保庆. 神华煤直接液化残渣热解特性研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2009, 37(4): 393-397. (CHU Xi-jie, LI Wen, BAI Zong-qing, LI Bao-qing, Pyrolysis characteristics of Shenhua direct liquefaction residue[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2009, 37(4): 393-397.) BENITO A M, MARTINEZ M T, FERNANDEZE I, MIRANDA J L. Visbreaking of an asphaltenic coal residue [J]. Fuel, 1995, 74(6): 927-933. COATS A W, REDFERN J P. Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data[J]. Nature, 1964, 201(4914): 68-69 TAGUCHI N, TSUJI T, SHIBATA T, ITOH H. Thermogravimetric analysis of coal liquefaction residues and their solvent extracts [J]. J Chem Soc Jpn, 2001, (10): 581-586. 朱学栋, 朱子彬, 朱学余, 张成芳. 煤化程度和升温速率对热分解影响的研究[J]. 煤炭转化, 1999, 22(2): 43-47. (ZHU Xue-dong, ZHU Zi-bin, ZHU Xue-yu, ZHANG Cheng-fang. Study on the effect of coal rank and heating rate on the pyrolysis[J]. Coal Conversion, 1999, 22(2): 43-47. ) 刘文郁, 杜铭华, 曲思建, 史士东. 神华煤直接液化残渣热解动力学研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2006, 31(2): 215-218. (LIU Wen-yu, DU Ming-hua, QU Si-jian, SHI Shi-dong. Pyrolysis kinetic of Shenhua direct coal liquefaction residue[J]. Jornal of China Coal Society, 2006, 31(2): 215-218. ) 崔洪, 杨建丽, 刘振宇, 毕继诚. 煤液化残渣中残留催化剂对其挥发分测定的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2001, 29(3): 228-231. (CUI Hong, YANG Jian-li, LIU Zhen-yu, BI Ji-cheng. Effects of remaining catalyst on volatile measurment of coal hydrogenation residue [J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2001, 29(3): 228-231.)
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1195
- HTML全文浏览量: 27
- PDF下载量: 794
- 被引次数: 0