留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

煤焦水蒸气气化动力学模型及参数敏感性研究

帅超,  宾谊沅,  胡松,  向军,  孙路石,  苏胜,  许凯,  徐朝芬

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 燃料化学学报（中英文）  > 2013 >  41(05): 558-564
帅超, 宾谊沅, 胡松, 向军, 孙路石, 苏胜, 许凯, 徐朝芬. 煤焦水蒸气气化动力学模型及参数敏感性研究[J]. 燃料化学学报（中英文）, 2013, 41(05): 558-564.
引用本文: 帅超, 宾谊沅, 胡松, 向军, 孙路石, 苏胜, 许凯, 徐朝芬. 煤焦水蒸气气化动力学模型及参数敏感性研究[J]. 燃料化学学报（中英文）, 2013, 41(05): 558-564.
shu
SHUAI Chao, BIN Yi-yuan, HU Song, XIANG Jun, SUN Lu-shi, SU Sheng, XU Kai, XU Chao-fen. Kinetic models of coal char steam gasification and sensitivity analysis of the parameters[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2013, 41(05): 558-564.
Citation: SHUAI Chao, BIN Yi-yuan, HU Song, XIANG Jun, SUN Lu-shi, SU Sheng, XU Kai, XU Chao-fen. Kinetic models of coal char steam gasification and sensitivity analysis of the parameters[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2013, 41(05): 558-564.
shu

煤焦水蒸气气化动力学模型及参数敏感性研究

  • 1.

    华中科技大学 煤燃烧国家重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430074;

  • 2.

    湖南省电力公司科学研究院, 湖南 长沙 410007

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51176062, 21176098); 国家重点基础研究发展规划(973计划, 2010CB227003)。
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    胡松, E-mail: hssh30@163.com。

  • 中图分类号: TQ541

Kinetic models of coal char steam gasification and sensitivity analysis of the parameters

  • 1.

    State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China;

  • 2.

    Hunan Electric Power Corporation Research Institute, Changsha 410007, China

    摘要
  • 摘要: 在热重分析仪上对小龙潭煤焦、府谷煤焦和晋城煤焦水蒸气气化过程进行了研究。使用收缩核模型、混合模型和随机孔模型模拟了三种煤焦水蒸气气化反应过程。结果表明,混合模型总体上模拟效果最好,收缩核模型和随机孔模型对低变质程度的小龙潭煤焦气化过程模拟效果不佳,但是适用于模拟另外两种煤阶较高的煤焦气化过程。求解了三种模型的动力学参数,并分析了不同模型参数出现差异的原因。同时,采用敏感性分析法定量研究了模型中的参数发生偏差时引起模型误差的大小,并通过比较发现反应速率常数k为敏感性因素,而混合模型中反应级数n和随机孔模型中孔结构参数ψ为非敏感性因素。
    Abstract: The steam gasification of XLT, FG and JC coal chars was studied by isothermal thermogravimetric analysis. The relationship between reaction rate and carbon conversion of three coal chars was simulated by shrinking core model(SCM), traditional model(TM) and random pore model(RPM). The results show that TM is the best one overall for three coals. SCM and RPM are not suitable to describe the gasification process of low-rank XLT coal char, though they have satisfied simulation results to the other two coal chars with higher coal rank. The kinetic parameters were calculated by three models, and the reason for their differences was analyzed. Based on the sensitivity analysis method, the error of the prediction with the change of parameters was studied. It is shown that the apparent reaction rate k is a sensitive parameter, and the reaction order n in the TM and the structural parameter ψ in the RPM are less sensitive parameters.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(21)
  • 张林仙, 黄戒介, 房倚天, 王洋. 中国无烟煤焦气化活性的研究——水蒸气与二氧化碳气化活性的比较[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2006, 34(03): 265-269. (ZHANG Lin-xian, HUANG Jie-jie, FANG Yi-tian, WANG Yan. Study on reactivity of Chinese anthracite chars gasification —Comparison of reactivity between steam and CO2 gasificaiton[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2006, 34(03): 265-269.)
    ZHANG L, HUANG J, FANG Y, WANG Y. Gasification reactivity and kinetics of typical chinese anthracite chars with steam and CO2[J]. Energy Fuels, 2006, 20(3): 1201-1210.
    EVERSON R C, NEOMAGUS H W J P, KASAINI H, NJAPHA D. Reaction kinetics of pulverized coal-chars derived from inertinite-rich coal discards: Gasification with carbon dioxide and steam[J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(7-8): 1076-1082.
    WU S, GU J, LI L, WU Y, GAO J. The reactivity and kinetics of yanzhou coal chars from elevated pyrolysis temperatures during gasification in steam at 900-1200℃[J]. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2006, 84(6): 420-428.
    王鹏, 文芳, 步学朋, 刘玉华, 邓一英. 煤焦与CO2及水蒸气气化反应的研究[J]. 煤气与热力, 2005, 25(03): 1-6. (WANG Peng, WEN Fang, BU Xue-peng, LIU Yu-hua, DENG Yi-ying. Study on gasification reaction of coal char with CO2 and water vapour[J]. Gas & Heat, 2005, 25(03): 1-6.)
    向银花, 王洋, 张建民, 黄戒介, 赵建涛. 煤气化动力学模型研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2002, 30(01): 21-26. (XIANG Yin-hua, WANG Yang, ZHANG Jian-min, HUANG Jie-jie, ZHAO Jian-tao. A study on kinetic models of char gasification[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2002, 30(01): 21-26.)
    FERMOSO J, ARIAS B, PEVIDA C, PLAZA M, RUBIERA F, PIS J. Kinetic models comparison for steam gasification of different nature fuel chars[J]. J Therm Anal Calorim, 2008, 91(3): 779-786.
    FERMOSO J, GIL M V, GARCI A S, PEVIDA C, PIS J J, RUBIERA F. Kinetic parameters and reactivity for the steam gasification of coal chars obtained under different pyrolysis temperatures and pressures[J]. Energy Fuels, 2011, 25(8): 3574-3580.
    蔡毅, 邢岩, 胡丹. 敏感性分析综述[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 44(01): 9-16. (CAI Yi, XING Yan, HU Dan. On sensitivity analysis[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science), 2008, 44(01): 9-16.)
    乔瑜, 徐明厚, H.Green W. 基于敏感性分析的H2/O2反应机理最优简化[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2006, 26(04): 16-20. (QIAO Yu, XU Ming-hou, WILLIAM H. Green. Optimally-reduced kinetic models of H2/O2 combustion mechanism based on sensitivity analysis[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2006, 26(04): 16-20.)
    SALTELLI A, TARANTOLA S, CAMPOLONGO F, RATTO M. Sensitivity analysis in practice: A guide to assessing scientific models[M]. Wiley: 2004.
    WEN C Y. Noncatalytic heterogeneous solid-fluid reaction models[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1968, 60(9): 34-54.
    周静, 周志杰, 龚欣, 于遵宏. 煤焦二氧化碳气化动力学研究(I)等温热重法[J]. 煤炭转化, 2002, 25(4): 66-67. (ZHOU Jing, ZHOU Zhi-jie, GONG Xin, YU Zun-hong. Study of char-CO2 gasification(I) by isothermal thermogravimetry[J]. Coal Convertion, 2002, 25(4): 66-67.)
    BHATIA S K, PERLMUTTER D D. A random pore model for fluid-solid reactions: I Isothermal, kinetic control[J]. AIChE Journal, 1980, 26(3): 379-386.
    YE D P, AGNEW J B, ZHANG D K. Gasification of a south australian low-rank coal with carbon dioxide and steam: Kinetics and reactivity studies[J]. Fuel, 1998, 77(11): 1209-1219.
    MIURA K, HASHIMOTO K, SILVESTON P L. Factors affecting the reactivity of coal chars during gasification, and indices representing reactivity[J]. Fuel, 1989, 68(11): 1461-1475.
    费华, 胡松, 向军, 孙路石, 石金明, 付鹏, 陈刚, 苏胜. 随机孔模型研究煤焦O2/CO2燃烧动力学特征[J]. 化工学报, 2011, 62(01): 199-205. (FEI Hua, HU Song, XIANG Jun,SUN Lu-shi, SHI Jin-ming, FU Peng, CHEN Gang, SU Sheng. Kinetics of coal char combustion with random pore model under O2/CO2 atmosphere[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), 2011, 62(01): 199-205.)
    MORIMOTO T, OCHIAI T, WASAKA S, ODA H. Modeling on pore variation of coal chars during CO2 gasification associated with their submicropores and closed pores[J]. Energy Fuels, 2005, 20(1): 353-358.
    LIU H, LUO C, KANEKO M, KATO S, KOJIMA T. Unification of gasification kinetics of char in CO2 at elevated temperatures with a modified random pore model[J]. Energy Fuels, 2003, 17(4): 961-970.
    ADANEZ J, DIEGO L F D. Reactivity of lignite chars with CO2: Influence of the mineral matter[J]. Int Chem Eng, 1993, 33(4): 656-662.
    KAJITANI S, SUZUKI N, ASHIZAWA M, HARA S. CO2 gasification rate analysis of coal char in entrained flow coal gasifier[J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(2): 163-169.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1916
  • HTML全文浏览量:  32
  • PDF下载量:  721
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-10-03
  • 修回日期:  2012-12-06
  • 刊出日期:  2013-05-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    友情链接： 新型炭材料 中国科学院 中国知网 万方论文查重系统

    主办单位：中国科学院山西煤炭化学研究所 中国化学会主编：房倚天

    电子邮件：rlhx@sxicc.ac.cn

    版权所有 © 《燃料化学学报（中英文）》编辑部 本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发    百度统计

    x 关闭 永久关闭

    2023年《燃料化学学报（中英文）》评优结果公布！