Adjustment in high temperature flow property of ash from Shanxi typical anthracite
-
摘要: 为满足气化炉液态排渣的要求,考察和比较了CaO、MgO和Fe2O3三种助熔剂对山西典型无烟煤煤灰流动性(熔融性和黏温特性)的影响.研究发现,MgO对硅铝比在1.2~2.0的高硅铝煤灰的流动温度降低最有效,其次为CaO和Fe2O3,这是由于使用各种助熔剂时生成不同的高温稳定矿物组分造成的.针对三种助熔剂建立了流动温度和完全液相温度的关系式,并得到了CaO和Fe2O3含量与流动温度的关系:FT = 1 593-9.573 × wCaO (R2=0.9429) 和FT =1 576-8.330 6 × wFe2O3 (R2=0.955 9),可以用于指导助熔剂的添加.CaO无论从降低黏度数值或降低临界黏度温度都具有最好的效果.Ca2+、Mg2+、Fe2+的电负性差异和高温下的产物不同是三种助剂对黏度数值影响不同的根本原因; Mg2+、Fe2+具有较小的离子半径以及单质铁在高温下析出是导致临界黏度温度较高的原因.Abstract: To meet the requirement of gasification of Shanxi anthracites with slag tapping, the effects of CaO, MgO and Fe2O3 flux on the improvement of ash fusibility and viscosity-temperature property were evaluated and compared. The results show that for high silicon and aluminum coal ash with the Si/Al ratio from 1.2 to 2.0, the order of fluxing effect is MgO > CaO > Fe2O3. The difference of fluxing effect is caused by the different stable minerals formed at high temperature. For three different fluxes, the relation between the flow temperature (FT) and the liquidus temperature (tliq) is determined. And a linear relationship between CaO or Fe2O3 content and FT is obtained as follows: FT= 1 593-9.573 × wCaO (R2=0.942 9) and FT = 1 576-8.330 6 × wFe2O3 (R2=0.955 9), which are useful to guide the addition of flux. CaO, MgO and Fe2O3 show different effects on the viscosity-temperature character. Judging from the viscosity value and the temperature of critical viscosity, CaO displays the best performance as a flux. The different electronegativity of Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe2+ and the formation of different minerals with addition of CaO, MgO and Fe2O3 at high temperature are responsible for the various influences of flux on the viscosity value. Small ion radius of Mg2+ and Fe2+ and the possible crystallization of iron at high temperature are the reasons for the higher temperature of critical viscosity.
-
陈鹏. 中国煤炭性质、分类和利用(第二版)[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2011. (CHEN Peng. Property, classification and utilization of Chinese coal(2nd Edition)[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2011.) 王洋, 房倚天, 黄戒介, 马小云, 吴晋沪. 煤气化技术的发展: 煤气化过程的分析和选择[J]. 东莞理工学院学报, 2006, 13(4): 93-100. (WANG Yang, FANG Yi-tian, HUANG Jie-jie, MA Xiao-yun, WU Jin-hu. Development of coal gasification technology: The process analysis and selection[J]. Journal of Dongguan University of Technology, 2006, 13(4): 93-100.) WILLIAMS A, POURKASHANIAN M, JONES J M. Combustion and gasification of coal[M]. New York: Taylor&Francis, 2000. 李文, 白进. 煤的灰化学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013. (LI Wen, BAI Jin. Chemistry of ash from coal[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013.) HUGGINS F E, KOSMACK D A, HUFFMAN G P. Correlation between ash-fusion temperatures and ternary equilibrium phase diagrams[J]. Fuel, 1981, 60(7): 577-584. JAK E. Prediction of coal ash fusion temperatures with the FACT thermodynamic computer package[J]. Fuel, 2002, 81(13): 1655-1668. SONG W, TANG L, ZHU X, WU Y, ZHU Z, KOYAMA S. Prediction of Chinese coal ash fusion temperatures in Ar and H2 atmospheres[J]. Energy Fuels, 2009, 23(4): 1990-1997. 魏雅娟, 李寒旭. 高温弱还原性气氛下MgO的助熔机理[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 28(4): 74-77. (WEI Ya-juan, LI Han-xu. Melting behavior of flux MgO in high temperature and less reductive atmosphere[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2008, 28(4): 74-77.) 李继炳, 沈本贤, 李寒旭, 赵基钢, 王基铭. 铁基助熔剂对皖北刘桥二矿煤的灰熔融特性影响研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2009, 37(3): 262-265. (LI Ji-bing, SHEN Ben-xian, LI Han-xu, ZHAO Ji-gang, WANG Ji-ming. Effect of ferrum-based flux on the melting characteristics of coal ash from coal blends using the Liu-qiao No.2 coal mine in Wan-bei[J]. Journal of Fuel and Chemistry, 2009, 37(3): 262-265.) PATTERSON J H, HURST H J, QUINTANAR A, BOYD R K, TRAN H. The slag flow characteristics of Australian bituminous coals in entrained-flow slagging gasifiers. 18th Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference. Pittsburgh, USA, 2001: 23. KONG L, BAI J, LI W, BAI Z. Effect of lime addition on slag fluidity of coal ash[J]. Journal of Fuel and Chemistry, 2011, 39(6): 407-411. KONG L, BAI J, BAI Z, GUO Z, LI W. Effects of CaCO3 on slag flow properties at high temperatures[J]. Fuel, 2013, 109: 76-85. HURST H J, NOVAK F, PATTERSON J H. Viscosity measurements and empirical predictions for some model gasifierslags[J]. Fuel, 1999, 78(4): 439-444. SONG W, SUN Y, WU Y, ZHU Z, KOYAMA S. Measurement and simulation of flow properties of coal ash slag in coal gasification[J]. AIChE J, 2011, 57(3): 801-818. 曹战民, 宋晓艳, 乔芝郁. 热力学模拟计算软件Factsage及其应用[J]. 稀有金属, 2008, 32(2): 216-219. (CAO Zhan-min, SONG Xiao-yan, QIAO Zhi-yu. Thermodynamic modeling software factsage and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rare Metal, 2008, 32(2): 216-219.) NOWOK J W. Viscosity and structural state of iron in coal ash slags under gasification conditions[J]. Energy Fuels, 1995, 9(3): 534-539.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1210
- HTML全文浏览量: 14
- PDF下载量: 656
- 被引次数: 0