留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

水蒸气气化条件下碳酸钾对煤灰烧结和矿物质演化的影响

李鹏飞 曲旋 张荣 毕继诚

李鹏飞, 曲旋, 张荣, 毕继诚. 水蒸气气化条件下碳酸钾对煤灰烧结和矿物质演化的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报(中英文), 2020, 48(9): 1047-1054.
引用本文: 李鹏飞, 曲旋, 张荣, 毕继诚. 水蒸气气化条件下碳酸钾对煤灰烧结和矿物质演化的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报(中英文), 2020, 48(9): 1047-1054.
LI Peng-fei, QU Xuan, ZHANG Rong, BI Ji-cheng. Effect of potassium carbonate on coal ash sintering and mineral transformation in H2O-H2-CO-CO2 atmosphere[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2020, 48(9): 1047-1054.
Citation: LI Peng-fei, QU Xuan, ZHANG Rong, BI Ji-cheng. Effect of potassium carbonate on coal ash sintering and mineral transformation in H2O-H2-CO-CO2 atmosphere[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2020, 48(9): 1047-1054.

水蒸气气化条件下碳酸钾对煤灰烧结和矿物质演化的影响

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金 21576275

NSFC-新疆联合基金资助 U1703253

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    张荣, Tel:0351-4151519, E-mail:zrbd@sxicc.ac.cn

  • 中图分类号: TQ53

Effect of potassium carbonate on coal ash sintering and mineral transformation in H2O-H2-CO-CO2 atmosphere

Funds: 

The project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China 21576275

NSFC-Xinjiang joint fund U1703253

More Information
  • 摘要: 在水蒸气气化气氛(水蒸气-氢气-一氧化碳-二氧化碳混合气氛)下考察了反应压力对负载碳酸钾煤灰烧结温度的影响,建立了包含煤的灰分、煤灰化学组成、催化剂负载量及反应压力因素的煤灰烧结温度预测关系式,预测结果与实测烧结温度的误差在±15℃(2%)范围内。利用X射线衍射仪和FactSage热力学计算软件对不同气氛和压力下煤灰中的矿物组成及含量的变化规律进行了分析。结果表明,碳酸钾与煤灰中的硬石膏、方解石反应生成硫酸钾和碳酸钾钙;水蒸气气化气氛下硫酸钾和赤铁矿被还原,碳酸钾钙的分解温度随反应压力的增大而升高;负载催化剂煤灰中氢氧化钾的量随温度和压力的提高而增加,不同压力下煤灰的最低烧结温度与氢氧化钾的含量有关,当氢氧化钾的含量达到一定值时,不同压力下对应的温度与实验测得的煤灰烧结温度接近。
  • 图  1  加压压差法煤灰烧结温度测定装置示意图

    Figure  1  Schematic diagram of pressurized sintering temperature determination apparatus

    1-constant pressure valve; 2-mass flowmeter; 3-high-pressure water pump; 4-preheater-heater; 5-cylinder ash column; 6-gas distributor; 7-electric furnace; 8-differential manometer; 9-thermocouple; 10-gas liquid separator; 11-back pressure regulator; 12-volumetric flow meter

    图  2  反应压力对煤灰烧结温度的影响

    Figure  2  Effect of pressure on sintering temperature

    图  3  烧结温度和压力之间的关系

    Figure  3  Relation between sintering temperature and pressure

    图  4  烧结温度预测值和测试值的比较

    Figure  4  Comparison of calculated sintering temperature with experimental one

    图  5  鄂尔多斯原煤灰及负载碳酸钾煤灰不同条件下反应后的XRD谱图

    Figure  5  XRD patterns of EEDS raw coal ash and potassium carbonate loaded coal ash under different conditions

    (a): EEDS raw coal ash; (b): EEDS-K coal ash a: EEDS raw coal ash; b: EEDS-N2-3.5 MPa; c: EEDS-mixture-3.5 MPa; d: EEDS-K ash; e: EEDS-K-N2-3.5 MPa; f: EEDS-K-mixture-0.1 MPa; g: EEDS-K-mixture-3.5 MPa; Q: quartz-SiO2; A: anhydrite-CaSO4; C: calcite-CaCO3; H: hematite-Fe2O3; Mu: muscovite-K0.77Al1.93(Al0.5Si3.5)O10(OH)2; An: anathite-CaAl2SiO8; Ma:magnetite-Fe3O4; Ar: arcanite-K2SO4; CaO: calcium oxide-CaO; B: butschliite-K2Ca(CO3)2; PC: potassium carbonate-K2CO3; PH: potassium carbonate hydrate-K2CO3 ·1.5H2O; PA: potassium aluminate silicate-K0.85Al0.85Si0.15O2; PS: potassium silicate-K2Si4O9; KA: kaliophilite-KAlSiO4

    图  6  文山原煤灰及负载碳酸钾煤灰不同条件下反应后的XRD谱图

    Figure  6  XRD patterns of WS raw coal ash and potassium carbonate loaded coal ash under different conditions

    (a): WS raw coal ash; (b): WS-K coal ash a: WS raw coal ash; b: WS-N2-3.5 MPa; c: WS-mixture-3.5 MPa; d: WS-K ash; e: WS-K-N2-3.5 MPa; f: WS-K-mixture-0.1 MPa; g: WS-K-mixture-3.5 MPa; Q: quartz-SiO2; A: anhydrite-CaSO4; C: calcite-CaCO3; H: hematite-Fe2O3; I: illite-K(Al4Si2O9(OH)3); An: anathite-CaAl2SiO8; Mu: muscovite-K0.77Al1.93(Al0.5Si3.5)O10(OH)2; Ma: magnetite-Fe3O4; Ar: arcanite-K2SO4; CaO: calcium oxide-CaO; B: butschliite-K2Ca(CO3)2; PH: potassium carbonate hydrate-K2CO3 ·1.5H2O; PC: potassium carbonate-K2CO3; PA: potassium aluminate silicate-K0.85Al0.85Si0.15O2; PS: potassium silicate-K2Si4O9; KA: kaliophilite-KAlSiO4

    图  7  负载催化剂文山煤灰中碳酸钾钙含量的计算

    Figure  7  Calculated results of the content of butschliite in WS-K coal ash versus temperature

    图  8  负载催化剂煤灰中氢氧化钾含量随温度的变化

    Figure  8  Calculated results of the content of KOH versus temperature (a): WS-K ash; (b): EEDS-K ash

    表  1  煤样的工业分析和元素分析

    Table  1  Proximate and ultimate analyses of coal samples

    Sample Proximate analysis wd/% Ultimate analysis wd/%
    A V FC C H N St O*
    WS 18.29 39.73 41.98 53.78 3.91 1.61 1.24 21.17
    EEDS 4.79 35.43 59.78 73.83 4.37 0.66 0.90 15.45
    A: ash; V: volatile matter; FC: fixed carbon; d: dry base; St: total sulfur; *: by difference
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  煤灰的化学组成

    Table  2  Chemical composition of coal ashes

    Sample Content w/%
    SiO2 Al2O3 TiO2 CaO Fe2O3 MgO K2O Na2O SO3
    WS 33.52 15.58 0.57 20.96 10.75 1.34 1.73 0.21 13.62
    EEDS 29.09 11.34 0.72 21.28 17.48 0.76 0.48 0.70 15.24
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  模拟计算负载碳酸钾煤灰的化学组成

    Table  3  Calculated composition of potassium carbonate loaded coal ashes

    Sample Content w/%
    K2Ca(CO3)2 K2CO3 KAlSiO4 K2SO4 K2Si2O5 Fe2O3 Mg2SiO4 Na2Ca2Si3O9 Ca3Fe2Si3O12 CaOMgOSiO2
    WS K-ash 34.09 18.73 18.54 13.93 9.64 4.12 0.90 0.05 - -
    EEDS K-ash 9.87 30.44 11.27 32.81 - 2.05 - 1.30 11.31 0.95
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] HIRSCH R L, GALLAGHER J E Jr, LESSARD R R, WESSELHOFT R D. Catalytic coal gasification:An emerging technology[J]. Science, 1982, 215(4529):121-127. doi: 10.1126/science.215.4529.121
    [2] VERAA M J, BELL A T. Effect of alkali metal catalysts on gasification of coal char[J]. Fuel, 1978, 57(4):194-200. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=pb/wz2UjXR1yvtiMN5cRB2833OngiCvi/EuU/jYJJs0=
    [3] YEBOAH Y D, XU Y, SHETH A, GODAVARTY A, AGRAWAL P K. Catalytic gasification of coal using eutectic salts:identification of eutectics[J]. Carbon, 2003, 41(2):203-214.
    [4] 樊利霞, 李克忠, 张荣, 毕继诚.负载碳酸钾煤焦上CO甲烷化反应的研究[J].燃料化学学报, 2014, 42(9):1047-1052. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rlhxxb201409004

    FAN Li-xia, LI Ke-zhong, ZHANG Rong, BI Ji-cheng. Methanation of CO over coal char loaded with K2CO3[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2014, 42(9):1047-1052. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rlhxxb201409004
    [5] 李伟伟, 李克忠, 康守国, 郑岩, 张荣, 毕继诚.煤催化气化中非均相反应动力学的研究[J].燃料化学学报, 2014, 42(3):290-296. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rlhxxb201403006

    LI Wei-wei, LI Ke-zhong, KANG Shou-guo, ZHENG Yan, ZHANG Rong, BI Ji-cheng. Heterogeneous reaction kinetics of catalytic coal gasification[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2014, 42(3):290-296. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rlhxxb201403006
    [6] 毛燕东, 金亚丹, 李克忠, 毕继诚, 李金来, 辛峰.煤催化气化工艺中内蒙王家塔烟煤灰烧结温度的影响因素分析[J].化工学报, 2015, 66(3):1080-1087. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hgxb2015030031

    MAO Yan-dong, JIN Ya-dan, LI Ke-zhong, BI Ji-cheng, LI Jin-lai. XIN Feng. Analysis of influencing factors on sintering temperature of Inner Mongolia Wangjiata bituminous coal ash during catalytic coal gasification[J]. CIESC J, 2015, 66(3):1080-1087. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hgxb2015030031
    [7] 毛燕东, 金亚丹, 李克忠, 毕继诚, 李金来, 辛峰.煤催化气化条件下不同煤种煤灰烧结行为研究[J].燃料化学学报, 2015, 43(4):402-409. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rlhxxb201504004

    MAO Yan-dong, JIN Ya-dan, LI Ke-zhong, BI Ji-cheng, LI Jin-lai, XIN Feng. Sintering behavior of different coal ashes in catalytic coal gasification process[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2015, 43(4):402-409. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rlhxxb201504004
    [8] 沙兴中, 杨南星.煤的气化与应用[M].上海:华东理工大学出版社, 1995.

    SHA Xing-zhong, YANG Nan-xing. Coal Gasification and Its Application[M]. Shanghai:East China University of Science and Technology Press, 1995.
    [9] 芦涛.催化气化结渣及钾迁移特性的基础研究[D].太原: 中国科学院山西煤炭化学研究所, 2015. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/thesis/Y2956501

    LU Tao. Fundamental research on agglomeration and potassium migration characteristics during catalytic coal gasification[D]. Taiyuan: Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/thesis/Y2956501
    [10] 王勤辉, 揭涛, 李小敏, 骆仲泱, 景妮洁, 岑可法.反应气氛对不同煤灰烧结温度影响的研究[J].燃料化学学报, 2010, 38(1):17-22. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rlhxxb201001004

    WANG Qin-hui, JIE Tao, LI Xiao-min, LUO Zhong-yang, JING Ni-jie, CEN Ke-fa. Experiments of the effects of reaction atmosphere on the coal ash sintering temperature[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2010, 38(1):17-22. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rlhxxb201001004
    [11] 李风海, 黄戒介, 房倚天, 王洋.小龙潭褐煤灰烧结温度影响因素的研究[J].洁净煤技术, 2011, 17(3):57-60. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jjmjs201103018

    LI Feng-hai, HUANG Jie-jie, FANG Yi-tian, WANG Yang. Research on the influencing factors of sintering temperature of Xiaolongtan lignite ashes[J]. Clean Coal Technol, 2011, 17(3):57-60. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jjmjs201103018
    [12] 王勤辉, 景妮洁, 骆仲泱, 李小敏, 揭涛.灰成分影响煤灰烧结温度的实验研究[J].煤炭学报, 2010, 35(6):1015-1020. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=mtxb201006028

    WANG Qin-hui, JING Ni-jie, LUO Zhong-yang, LI Xiao-min, JIE Tao. Experiments on the effect of chemical components of coal ash on the sintering temperature[J]. J China Coal Soc, 2010, 35(6):1015-1020. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=mtxb201006028
    [13] HU H W, ZHOU K, MENG K S, SONG L B, LIN Q Z. Effects of SiO2/Al2O3 ratios on sintering characteristics of synthetic coal ash[J]. Energies, 2017, 10(2):242. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=MDPI000000198789
    [14] CHENG X L, WANG Y G, LIN X C, BI J C, ZHANG R, BAI L. Effects of SiO2-Al2O3-CaO/FeO low-temperature eutectics on slagging characteristics of coal ash[J]. Energy Fuels, 2017, 31(7):6748-6757. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00535
    [15] LU T, LI K Z, ZHANG R, BI J C. Addition of ash to prevent agglomeration during catalytic coal gasification in a pressurized fluidize bed[J]. Fuel Process Technol, 2015, 134:414-423. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.02.024
    [16] WANG L, HUSTAD J E, GRONLI M. Sintering characteristics and mineral transformation behaviors of corn cob ashes[J]. Energy Fuels, 2012, 26(9):5905-5916. doi: 10.1021/ef300215x
    [17] JING N J, WANG Q H, CHENG L M, LUO Z Y, CEN K F. The sintering behavior of coal ash under pressurized conditions[J]. Fuel, 2013, 103:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.09.025
    [18] JING N J, WANG Q H, LUO Z Y, CEN K F. Effect of chemical composition on sintering behavior of Jincheng coal ash under gasification atmosphere[J]. Chem Eng Commun, 2012, 199(2):189-202. doi: 10.1080/00986445.2011.582531
    [19] 郑绍聪, 宁平, 马丽萍, 杜亚雷, 张伟, 牛学奎.不同气氛下磷石膏热分解的反应特性[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2010, 34(3):580-583. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=whjtkjdxxb201003038

    ZHENG Shao-cong, NING Ping, MA Li-ping, DU Ya-lei, ZHANG Wei, NIU Xue-kui. Reaction properties of thermal decomposition of phosphogypsum in different atmospheres[J]. J Wuhan Univ Technol (Transp Sci Eng), 2010, 34(3):580-583. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=whjtkjdxxb201003038
    [20] 陈升, 刘少文.氢气还原分解硫酸钙的热力学研究[J].化学工业与工程技术, 2012, 33(5):7-11. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hxgyygcjs201205002

    CHEN Sheng, LIU Shao-wen. Thermodynamic study on reductive decomposition of calcium sulfate with hydrogen[J]. J Chem Ind Eng, 2012, 33(5):7-11. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hxgyygcjs201205002
    [21] ENNACIRI Y, EL ALAOUI-BELGHITI H, BETTACH M. Comparative study of K2SO4 production by wet conversion from phosphogypsum and synthetic gypsum[J]. J Mater Res Technol, 2019, 8(3):2586-2596. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785418306446
    [22] AREFIEV A V, PODBORODNIKOV I V, SHATSKIY A F, LITASOV K D. Synthesis and Raman spectra of K-Ca double carbonates:K2Ca(CO3)2 butschliite, fairchildite, and K2Ca2(CO3)3 at 1 atm[J]. Geochem Int, 2019, 57(9):981-987. doi: 10.1134/S0016702919090039
    [23] ARCEO H B, GLASSER F P. Fluxing reactions of sulfates and carbonates in cement clinkering II. The system CaCO3-K2CO3[J]. Cement Concrete Res, 1995, 25(2):339-344. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0008884695000194
  • 加载中
图(9) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  200
  • HTML全文浏览量:  90
  • PDF下载量:  14
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-08-01
  • 修回日期:  2020-08-28
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-01-23
  • 刊出日期:  2020-09-10

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回