留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

脱硫废水蒸发增强电除尘脱除PM2.5和SO3实验研究

胡斌 王晓焙 白璐 梁财 杨林军

胡斌, 王晓焙, 白璐, 梁财, 杨林军. 脱硫废水蒸发增强电除尘脱除PM2.5和SO3实验研究[J]. 燃料化学学报(中英文), 2017, 45(7): 889-896.
引用本文: 胡斌, 王晓焙, 白璐, 梁财, 杨林军. 脱硫废水蒸发增强电除尘脱除PM2.5和SO3实验研究[J]. 燃料化学学报(中英文), 2017, 45(7): 889-896.
HU Bin, WANG Xiao-bei, BAI Lu, LIANG Cai, YANG Lin-jun. Experimental study on strengthening the electrostatic precipitation removal of PM2.5 and SO3 by desulfurization wastewater evaporation[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2017, 45(7): 889-896.
Citation: HU Bin, WANG Xiao-bei, BAI Lu, LIANG Cai, YANG Lin-jun. Experimental study on strengthening the electrostatic precipitation removal of PM2.5 and SO3 by desulfurization wastewater evaporation[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2017, 45(7): 889-896.

脱硫废水蒸发增强电除尘脱除PM2.5和SO3实验研究

基金项目: 

国家重点基础研究发展规划 973 program

国家重点基础研究发展规划 2013CB228505

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    杨林军, E-mail:ylj@seu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: X51

Experimental study on strengthening the electrostatic precipitation removal of PM2.5 and SO3 by desulfurization wastewater evaporation

Funds: 

the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China 973 program

the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China 2013CB228505

  • 摘要: 搭建燃煤热态实验系统,研究脱硫废水蒸发对电除尘和脱硫系统的影响;考察脱硫废水蒸发前后细颗粒粒径的变化、电除尘出口PM2.5和SO3浓度变化;分析增强电除尘脱除PM2.5和SO3机理。结果表明,脱硫废水蒸发后,蒸发室出口细颗粒粒径峰值由0.1 μm增大到1.1 μm,观察脱硫废水蒸发前后扫描电镜,明显观察到废水蒸发后颗粒团聚长大,颗粒间存在絮状物;采用脱硫废水烟道蒸发后,电除尘细颗粒脱除效率提高5%左右,PM2.5数量浓度脱除效率提高25%左右;SO3脱除效率为60%-80%,烟气中SO3浓度对增强电除尘脱除PM2.5和SO3均有影响;脱硫废水蒸发对脱硫系统的效率和脱硫浆液的pH值没有影响。
  • 图  1  燃煤热态实验装置示意图

    Figure  1  Coal-fired thermal state experiment system

    图  2  细颗粒物的粒径分布

    Figure  2  Change of diameter distribution of particles

    图  3  细颗粒物的SEM照片

    Figure  3  SEM of fine particles

    图  4  电除尘出口细颗粒累积分布

    Figure  4  Fine particle cumulative distribution at ESP outlet

    图  5  电除尘出口细颗粒质量和数量浓度

    Figure  5  Fine particle mass and number concentration at ESP outlet

    : number concentration; : mass concentration

    图  6  电除尘总尘和PM2.5脱除效率

    Figure  6  ESP total dust and PM2.5 removal efficiency

    图  7  不同温度下飞灰的比电阻

    Figure  7  Fly ash resistance under different temperatures

    图  8  不同脱硫废水蒸发量下PM2.5和SO3的脱除效率

    Figure  8  Removal efficiency of PM2.5 and SO3 under different flows

    ○: PM2.5 removal efficiency; ■: SO3 removal efficiency at initial 180 ℃; □: SO3 removal efficiency at initial 150 ℃

    图  9  不同SO3浓度下PM2.5和SO3的脱除效率

    Figure  9  Removal efficiency of PM2.5 and SO3 under different SO3 concentrations

    : removal efficiency of SO3; : removal efficiency of PM2.5

    图  10  SO3在飞灰上凝结机理示意图

    Figure  10  SO3 coagulation mechanism in fly ash

    图  11  脱硫系统SO2脱除效率和浆液pH值

    Figure  11  Desulfurization efficiency and slurry pH value

    : desulfurization efficiency; : pH value; : system start time

    表  1  脱硫废水水质分析

    Table  1  Analysis of desulfurization wastewater

    表  2  不同液滴粒径烟道蒸发时间

    Table  2  Evaporation time for different droplet diameters

  • [1] 杨林军.燃烧源细颗粒物污染控制技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2011.

    YANG Lin-jun. Pollution Control Technology of Fine Particles from the Combustion Sources[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2011.
    [2] GB13223-2011, 火电厂大气污染物排放标准[S].

    GB13223-2011, Emission standard of air pollutants for thermal power plants[S].
    [3] 中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会. 煤电节能减排升级与改造行动计划(2014-2020)[EB/OL]. http: //www. Sdpc. gov. cn/gzdt/201409/t20140919_626240. ht, 2014-09-12.
    [4] KIM K, YANG S, EUM H. Analysis of the scale formed in FGD facility[J]. Anal Sci, 2007, 17:i1615-i1617.
    [5] 李文艳, 王冀星, 车建炜.湿法脱硫烟气湿排问题分析[J].中国电机工程学报, 2007, 27(14):36-40. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2007.14.007

    LI Wen-yan, WANG Ji-xing, CHE Jian-wei. Wet flue gas desulfurization wet exhaust problem analysis[J]. Proc CSEE, 2007, 27(14):36-40. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2007.14.007
    [6] MA S C, CHAI J, CHEN G D. Research on desulfurization wastewater evaporation:Present and future perspectives[J]. Renew Sust Energy Rev, 2016, 58:1143-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.252
    [7] 张志荣. 火电厂湿法烟气脱硫废水喷雾蒸发处理方法关键问题研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2011.

    ZHANG Zhi-rong. Study on key problems of the thermal power plant FGD waste water with evaporation treatment[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2011.
    [8] 张子敬, 汪建文, 高艺, 温高, 孙世昌, 朗林茂.燃煤电厂脱硫废水烟气蒸发特性流场模拟[J].煤炭学报, 2015, 40(3):678-683. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201503032.htm

    ZHANG Zi-jing, WANG Jian-wen, GAO Yi, WEN Gao, SUN Shi-chang, LANG Lin-mao. Flow field simulation of smoke and gas evaporation characteristics of desulfurization wastewater in coal-fired power plant[J]. J China Coal Soc, 2015, 40(3):678-683. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201503032.htm
    [9] 邓佳佳. 燃煤电厂烟气脱硫吸收塔内过程优化及脱硫废水的零排放处理[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2015.

    DENG Jia-jia. Study on optimization of coal combustion power plant WFGD spray scrubber process and zero discharge of WFGD wastewate[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2015.
    [10] 马双忱, 柴峰, 吴文龙, 于伟静, 陈公达.脱硫废水烟道蒸发工艺影响因素实验研究[J].环境科学与技术, 2015, 38(12):297-301. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJKS2015S2059.htm

    MA Shuang-chen, CHAI Feng, WU Wen-long, YU Wei-jin, CHEN Gong-da. Experimental research on influencing factors of flue evaporation treatment for desulfurization wastewater[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2015, 38(12):297-301. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJKS2015S2059.htm
    [11] Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Mitsubishi gas-gas heater[Z]. Japan:Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, 1986.
    [12] HONJO S, SHINODA T, NAKAYAMA Y. MHI Wet-FGD waste water treatment technologies[R]. Japan:Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, 1987.
    [13] MIERZEJEWSKI M K. The treatment and disposal of wastewater from flue gas desulphurization plant[J]. IWC, 1991, 24(2):125-129.
    [14] 刘勇, 杨林军, 潘丹萍, 赵汶, 刘瑞, 胡斌.化学团聚降低WFGD系统PM2.5排放的试验研究[J].东南大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 45(2):320-327. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX201502022.htm

    LIU Yong, YANG Lin-jun, PAN Dan-ping, ZHAO Wen, LIU Rui, HU Bin. Experimental study on amount reduce of PM2.5 discharged from WFGD by chemical agglomeration[J]. J Southeast Univ:Nat Sci Ed, 2015, 45(2):320-327. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX201502022.htm
    [15] 潘丹萍, 吴昊, 黄荣廷, 张亚平, 杨林军.石灰石-石膏法烟气脱硫过程中SO3酸雾脱除特性[J].东南大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 46(2):311-316.

    PAN Dan-ping, WU Hao, HUANG Rong-ting, ZHANG Ya-ping, YANG Lin-jun. Removal properties of sulfuric acid mist during limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization process[J]. J Southeast Univ:Nat Sci Ed, 2016, 46(2):311-316.
    [16] 周力行.多相湍流反应流体力学[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 2002.

    ZHOU Li-xing. Dynamics of Multiphase Turbulent Reacting Fluid Flows[M]. Beijing:National Defence Industry Press, 2002.
    [17] KUO K K. Principles of Combustion[M]. New York:John Wiley and Sons, 1986.
    [18] 岳勇, 陈雷, 姚强, 李水清.燃煤锅炉颗粒物粒径分布和痕量元素富集特性实验研究[J].中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(18):74-79. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2005.18.013

    YUE Yong, CHEN Lei, YAO Qiang, LI Shui-qing. Study on characteristics of particulate matter size distribution and trace elements enrichment in emission from a pulverized coal-fired boiler[J]. Proc CSEE, 2005, 25(18):74-79. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2005.18.013
    [19] 常景彩. 柔性集尘极应用于燃煤脱硫烟气深度净化的试验研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2011.

    CHANG Jing-cai. Experimental study on flexible collection electrode applied in advanced purification for coal fired flue gas following WFGD[D]. Jinan:Shangdong University, 2011.
    [20] 齐立强, 阎维平, 原永涛.燃煤锅炉电除尘器飞灰物化性质及逃逸机制[J].中国电机工程学报, 2007, 27(5):45-48. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDC200705008.htm

    QI Li-qiang, YAN Wei-ping, YUAN Yong-tao. Physicochemical characteristics and the mechanism of fly ash escaped from electrostatic precipitator of coal-fired boiler[J]. Proc CSEE, 2007, 27(5):45-48. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDC200705008.htm
    [21] MOSER R E. SO3 impacts on plant O&M:part Ⅰ[J]. Power, 2005, 150(8):10-15.
    [22] 楼清刚.煤燃烧过程中SO3的生成试验研究[J].能源工程, 2008, 6(1):46-49. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=nygc200806019&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ

    LOU Qing-gang. Study on the formation mechanism of SO3 during coal burning[J]. Energy Eng, 2008, 6(1):46-49. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=nygc200806019&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [23] 肖刚, 金保升, 刘继驰, 仲兆平, 肖睿, 黄亚继, 钟文琪, 王小芳, 徐艳.烟气湿法脱硫用石灰石溶解速率定量分析[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 38(6):1029-1033. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2008.06.018

    XIAO Gang, JIN Bao-sheng, LIU Ji-chi, ZHONG Zhao-ping, XIAO Rui, HUANG Ya-ji, ZHONG Wen-qi, WANG Xiao-fang, XU Yan. Quantitative analysis of dissolution rate of limestone used in WFGD[J]. J Southeast Univ:Nat Sci Ed, 2008, 38(6):1029-1033. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2008.06.018
    [24] 颜金培, 杨林军, 鲍静静.湿法脱硫烟气中细颗粒物的变化特性[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 41(2):387-392. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX201102034.htm

    YAN Jin-pei, YANG Lin-jun, BAO Jing-jing. Impact property on fine particles from coal combustion in wet flue gas desulfurization process[J]. J Southeast Univ:Nat Sci Ed, 2011, 41(2):387-392. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX201102034.htm
  • 加载中
图(11) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  97
  • HTML全文浏览量:  47
  • PDF下载量:  6
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-03-06
  • 修回日期:  2017-04-21
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-01-23
  • 刊出日期:  2017-07-10

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回