Formation of perovskite-type LaNiO3 on La-Ni/Al2O3-ZrO2 catalysts and their performance for CO methanation
-
摘要: 尽管Ni基催化剂已被工业化应用于CO甲烷化反应,但催化剂的积炭和烧结仍是需要解决的主要问题。本研究采用中和水解+柠檬酸络合法制备了负载型LaNiO3/Al2O3-ZrO2 CO甲烷化催化剂, 研究了La-Ni负载量和载体焙烧温度对催化剂结构和催化活性的影响,用XRD、H2-TPR、BET、XPS、TEM等表征手段研究了催化剂前驱体到还原后的结构演变。结果表明,以均相的Al-Zr固溶体为载体制备的催化剂更易于形成LaNiO3结构的活性组分,LaNiO3还原的Ni0是保持高温活性的主要原因。La-Ni的负载量影响LaNiO3的存在和Ni还原状态。其中30%的La-Ni负载量易于形成LaNiO3,该催化剂还原后产生的Ni0和La2O3高度分散在载体表面,并且Ni0纳米粒子被载体和La2O3锚定,抑制了Ni0粒子在高温条件下的迁移和聚集而表现出高的热稳定性。Abstract: The carbon deposition and sintering of Ni-based catalysts, used in CO methanation, are the main problems to be solved. In this paper, supported LaNiO3/Al2O3-ZrO2 catalyst was prepared by neutralization hydrolysis-citric acid complexation method. The effects of La-Ni loading and calcination temperature of support on the structure and catalytic activity of the catalyst were investigated. The structural evolution of catalyst precursor before and after reduction was studied via XRD, H2-TPR, BET, XPS, TEM and other characterization methods. The results showed that the catalyst supported by homogeneous Al-Zr solid solution was beneficial to form the active component with LaNiO3 structure, and the Ni0 derived from LaNiO3 was the key factor for keeping the activity at high temperature. The La-Ni loading affected the formation of LaNiO3 and the reduction state of Ni. Among the catalysts studied, 30% of the La-Ni loading was more favorable for the formation of perovskite LaNiO3. The Ni0 and La2O3 reduced from LaNiO3 were highly dispersed on the surface of the support, and the Ni0 nanoparticles were anchored by the support and La2O3, which inhibited the migration and aggregation of Ni0 particles at high temperature and thus led to high thermal stability.
-
Key words:
- CO methanation /
- aluminum zirconium composite oxide /
- perovskite /
- nickel /
- lanthanum oxide
-
Table 1 Physical properties of AZ700 support and yL-N/AZ700 catalysts
Sample SBET a/(m2·g−1) Pore size a/nm Pore volume a/(cm3·g−1) Nib/% The proportion of the reduction peaks c/% peak1 peak2 peak3 peak4 AZ700 55.8 16.8 0.614 − − − − − 10L-N/AZ700 81.9 11.2 0.412 1.3 − − − 100 20L-N/AZ700 72.8 12.0 0.387 2.74 25.3 12.1 8.9 53.7 30L-N/AZ700 68.1 10.6 0.296 1.96 15.6 29.2 31.5 23.7 40LN/AZ700 38.0 13.0 0.270 5.16 31.6 16.6 34.0 17.8 a: specific surface area of the supports and as-prepared samples were calculated using Brumauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) modeling;
b: surface nickel atom fraction determined by XPS; c: the proportion of the different reduction peaks areas through H2-TPR -
[1] LIU Q, SUN J, FENG Q. A La-promoted Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst with superior methanation performance for the production of synthetic natural gas[J]. Catal Today,2020,339:127−134. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.07.034 [2] RONSCH S, SCHNEIDER J, MATTHISCHKE S. Review on methanation - From fundamentals to current projects[J]. Fuel,2016,166:276−296. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.111 [3] HAN Y, QUAN Y, HAO P. Highly anti-sintering and anti-coking ordered mesoporous silica carbide supported nickel catalyst for high temperature CO methanation[J]. Fuel,2019,257:116006. [4] KAMATA H, TIAN Z Q, IZUMI Y. Dispersed and high loading Ni catalyst stabilized in porous SiO2 matrix for substituted natural gas production[J]. Catal Today,2018,299:193−200. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.03.003 [5] ZHANG A H, ZHU J, DUAN W H. CO methanation on Ni(111) and modified Ni3Al(111) surfaces: A first-principle study[J]. Surf Sci,2007,601(2):475−478. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2006.10.009 [6] CASTILLO J, ARTEAGA-PÉREZ L E, KARELOVIC A. The consequences of surface heterogeneity of cobalt nanoparticles on the kinetics of CO methanation[J]. Catal Sci Technol,2019,9(22):6415−6427. doi: 10.1039/C9CY01753D [7] CHEN S, ABDEL-MAGEED A M, GAUCKLER C. Selective CO methanation on isostructural Ru nanocatalysts: The role of support effects[J]. J Catal,2019,373:103−115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.03.015 [8] ABDEL-MAGEED A M, WIDMANN D, OLESEN S E. Selective CO methanation on highly active Ru/TiO2 catalysts: Identifying the physical origin of the observed activation/deactivation and loss in selectivity[J]. ACS Catal,2018,8(6):5399−5414. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00384 [9] FAJÍN J L C, GOMES J R B, D. S. CORDEIRO M N. Mechanistic study of carbon monoxide methanation over pure and rhodium- or ruthenium-doped nickel catalysts[J]. J Phys Chem C,2015,119(29):16537−16551. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01837 [10] JENEWEIN B, FUCHS M, HAYEK K. The CO methanation on Rh/CeO2 and CeO2/Rh model catalysts: A comparative study[J]. Surf Sci. 2003, 532−535: 364-369. [11] HU X, YAN W, DING W. Bifunctional palladium composite membrane for hydrogen separation and catalytic CO methanation[J]. Chin J Catal,2013,34(9):1720−1729. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60636-6 [12] LI S, GONG D, TANG H. Preparation of bimetallic Ni@Ru nanoparticles supported on SiO2 and their catalytic performance for CO methanation[J]. Chem Eng J,2018,334:2167−2178. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.124 [13] ZHAO B, YAO Y, SHI H. Preparation of Ni/SiO2 catalyst via novel plasma-induced micro-combustion method[J]. Catal Today,2019,337:28−36. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.04.068 [14] ROMBI E, CUTRUFELLO M G, ATZORI L. CO methanation on Ni-Ce mixed oxides prepared by hard template method[J]. Appl Catal A:Gen,2016,515:144−153. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2016.02.002 [15] ZHAI Y, XIONG J, LI C. Influence of preparation method on performance of a metal supported perovskite catalyst for combustion of methane[J]. J Rare Earths,2010,28(1):54−58. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0721(09)60050-8 [16] GONG D, LI S, GUO S. Lanthanum and cerium co-modified Ni/SiO2 catalyst for CO methanation from syngas[J]. Appl Surf Sci,2018,434:351−364. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.179 [17] HWANG S, HONG U G, LEE J. Methanation of carbon dioxide over mesoporous nickel-M-alumina (M = Fe, Zr, Ni, Y, and Mg) xerogel catalysts: Effect of second metal[J]. Catal Lett,2012,142(7):860−868. doi: 10.1007/s10562-012-0842-0 [18] JIANG P, ZHAO J, HAN Y. Highly active and dispersed Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for CO methanation prepared by the cation-anion double-hydrolysis method: Effects of Zr, Fe, and Ce promoters[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res,2019,58(27):11728−11738. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00002 [19] LI Z, ZHAO T, ZHANG L. Promotion effect of additive Fe on Al2O3 supported Ni catalyst for CO2 methanation[J]. Appl Organomet Chem,2018,32(5). [20] PHUNG T K, PHAM T L M, NGUYEN A-N T. Effect of supports and promoters on the performance of Ni-based catalysts in ethanol steam reforming[J]. Chem Eng Technol,2020,43(4):672−688. [21] ZHANG M, YU F, LI J. High CO methanation performance of two-dimensional Ni/MgAl layered double oxide with enhanced oxygen vacancies via flash nanoprecipitation[J]. Catalysts,2018,8(9). [22] DING C, GAO X, HAN Y. Effects of surface states over core-shell Ni@SiO2 catalysts on catalytic partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas[J]. J Energy Chem,2015,24(1):45−53. doi: 10.1016/S2095-4956(15)60283-2 [23] SI J, LIU G, LIU J. Ni nanoparticles highly dispersed on ZrO2 and modified with La2O3 for CO methanation[J]. RSC Adv,2016,6(15):12699−12707. doi: 10.1039/C5RA26888E [24] HAN Y, WEN B, ZHU M. Lanthanum incorporated in MCM-41 and its application as a support for a stable Ni-based methanation catalyst[J]. J Rare Earths,2018,36(4):367−373. doi: 10.1016/j.jre.2017.07.016 [25] RABELO-NETO R C, SALES H B E, INOCÊNCIO C V M. CO2 reforming of methane over supported LaNiO3 perovskite-type oxides[J]. Appl Catal B: Environ,2018,221:349−361. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.022 [26] ZHAO L, HAN T, WANG H. Ni-Co alloy catalyst from LaNi1−xCoxO3 perovskite supported on zirconia for steam reforming of ethanol[J]. Appl Catal B: Environ,2016,187:19−29. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.007 [27] WANG X, ZHU L, ZHUO Y. Enhancement of CO2 methanation over La-Modified Ni/SBA-15 catalysts prepared by different doping methods[J]. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng,2019,7(17):14647−14660. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02563 [28] LIU Q, GU F, GAO J. Coking-resistant Ni-ZrO2/Al2O3 catalyst for CO methanation[J]. J Energy Chem,2014,23(6):761−770. doi: 10.1016/S2095-4956(14)60210-2 [29] ZHANG X, RUI N, JIA X. Effect of decomposition of catalyst precursor on Ni/CeO2 activity for CO methanation[J]. Chin J Catal,2019,40(4):495−503. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63289-4 [30] NGUYEN T T M, WISSING L, SKJØTH-RASMUSSEN M S. High temperature methanation: Catalyst considerations[J]. Catal Today,2013,215:233−238. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.03.035 [31] GUO C, WU Y, QIN H. CO methanation over ZrO2/Al2O3 supported Ni catalysts: A comprehensive study[J]. Fuel Process Technol,2014,124:61−69. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.02.017 [32] LIN J, MA C, WANG Q. Enhanced low-temperature performance of CO2 methanation over mesoporous Ni/Al2O3-ZrO2 catalysts[J]. Appl Catal B: Environ,2019,243:262−272. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.059 [33] LI L, HUO M, ZHANG Y. Synthesis of nickel catalysts supported on Zr-doped ordered mesoporous Al2O3 and their catalytic performance for low-temperature CO2 reforming of CH4[J]. J Porous Mater,2017,24(6):1613−1625. doi: 10.1007/s10934-017-0401-6 [34] SOUZA M M V M, ARANDA D A G, SCHMAL M. Reforming of methane with carbon dioxide over Pt/ZrO2/Al2O3 catalysts[J]. J Catal,2001,204(2):498−511. doi: 10.1006/jcat.2001.3398 [35] SONG J H, HAN S J, SONG I K. Hydrogen production by steam reforming of ethanol over mesoporous Ni-Al2O3-ZrO2 catalysts[J]. Catal Surv Asia,2017,21(3):114−129. doi: 10.1007/s10563-017-9230-5 [36] MORADI G R, RAHMANZADEH M, KHOSRAVIAN F. The effects of partial substitution of Ni by Zn in LaNiO3 perovskite catalyst for methane dry reforming[J]. J CO2 Util,2014,6:7−11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2014.02.001 [37] WANG S, ZHANG L, ZHANG W Y. Selective conversion of CO2 into propene and butene[J]. Chem,2020,6:1−20. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.12.023