Synthesis of γ-valerolactone through coupling of methyl levulinate hydrogenation with aqueous phase reforming of methanol over Pt/CoxAl catalyst
-
摘要: 生物质衍生物乙酰丙酸甲酯(ML)加氢制备高值化学品γ-戊内酯(GVL)通常需要在高压氢气中进行,存在成本高和危险性大等问题。本研究采用Pt/CoxAl催化剂,将ML加氢反应与甲醇水液相重整(APRM)相耦合制备GVL,甲醇重整所获得的氢气原位用于ML的加氢反应,避免了外部氢源的使用,并考察了催化剂组成、反应溶液浓度和反应温度等条件对催化反应性能的影响。结果表明,Pt/CoxAl催化剂在该耦合反应体系中具有优异的催化性能,GVL收率高达98.2%,六次循环后性能仍保持稳定。多种表征手段证明,Pt0是ARPM和ML加氢反应的活性中心,Brønsted酸位点则促进ML水解和中间体的内酯化反应,两者之间的协同作用推动了GVL的生成。Pt与CoxAl载体之间存在强相互作用,Co含量适宜时,Pt/CoxAl催化剂具有较高的Pt分散度和丰富的Brønsted酸位点,因而表现出优异的催化性能。这些结果对探索新型高效的生物质衍生物制备燃料和化学品反应过程具有重要的参考价值。Abstract: The synthesis of high-value γ-valerolactone (GVL) from biomass-derived methyl levulinate (ML) conventionally requires a high-pressure hydrogenation process, which incurs significant costs and safety concerns. This study proposes an innovative approach to produce GVL by integrating ML hydrogenation with aqueous phase reforming of methanol (APRM) using Pt/CoxAl catalysts, thereby eliminating the need for an external hydrogen source. The influence of catalyst composition, methanol concentration, and reaction temperature on catalytic performance has been carefully examined. The results suggest that Pt/Co1Al demonstrated exceptional activity, yielding up to 98.2% GVL, and maintaining stable performance over multiple cycles. Characterization results revealed that Pt0 facilitates both APRM and ML hydrogenation, while Brønsted acid sites catalyze the hydrolysis of ML and lactonization of intermediates. The synergy between Pt0 and Brønsted acid sites is essential for GVL formation. The appropriate amount of Co not only enhances Pt dispersion but also increases Brønsted acid sites, thereby boosting catalytic efficiency. This work offers a sustainable and economically feasible strategy for transforming biomass derivatives into valuable fuels and chemicals.
-
Key words:
- aqueous phase reforming of methanol /
- methyl levulinate /
- γ-valerolactone /
- Pt /
- hydrogenation
-
图 6 不同Pt/CoxAl催化剂上APRM耦合ML加氢的(a)反应性能,(b)H2产量,及不同浓度甲醇溶液中,Pt/Co0.5Al催化剂(c)反应性能,(d)H2产量
Figure 6 (a) Catalytic performance and (b) H2 production over various Pt/CoxA catalysts for coupling of ML hydrogenation with APRM; (c) catalytic performance and (d) H2 production on the Pt/Co0.5Al catalyst for ML hydrogenation coupled with APRM with different methanol concentrations
表 1 Pt/CoxAl催化剂的载体粒径、Pt负载量及Co/Al物质的量比
Table 1 Particle size of the CoxAl supports and Pt loading and Co/Al molar ratio of the Pt/CoxAl catalysts
Sample Pt/% Co/Al
by ICPCo/Al
by XPSSupport particle size
before loading Pt/nmSupport particle size
after loading Pt/nmPt/Al2O3 0.95 − − − − Pt/Co0.25Al 0.95 0.24 0.19 11.6 10.6 Pt/Co0.5Al 0.95 0.51 0.24 17.1 15.8 Pt/Co0.75Al 0.96 0.73 0.37 20.6 17.2 Pt/Co1Al 0.93 0.96 0.51 31.1 23.0 表 2 Pt/CoxAl催化剂的酸碱性质
Table 2 Acidity/basicity of various Pt/CoxAl catalysts
Sample Basicity by CO2-TPD/
(μmol·g−1)Acidity by NH3-TPD/
(μmol·g−1)Acidity by Py-FTIR/(μmol·g−1) Brønsted Lewis Pt/Al2O3 1838 849 3.68 239.9 Pt/Co0.25Al 1481 570 4.49 159.4 Pt/Co0.5Al 1469 534 5.86 108.1 Pt/Co0.75Al 754 532 7.72 100.3 Pt/Co1Al 659 412 9.94 73.5 表 3 Pt分散度、CO原位吸附DRIFTS实验及XPS测得的表面Pt相对含量
Table 3 Pt dispersion and relative Pt content determined by CO in-situ DRIFTS and XPS
Sample Pt dispersion/% Peak area of CO adsorption nPt/nPtCoAl/% Pt/Al2O3 42.7 4.1 0.28 Pt/Co0.25Al 31.8 3.2 0.40 Pt/Co0.5Al 37.9 11.6 0.72 Pt/Co0.75Al 49.9 17.9 1.44 Pt/Co1Al 66.8 27.0 1.78 -
[1] LI X, ZHANG L, WANG S, WU Y. Recent advances in aqueous-phase catalytic conversions of biomass platform chemicals over heterogeneous catalysts[J]. Front Chem,2019,7:948−968. [2] BOZELL J J, PETERSEN G R. Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates—the US Department of Energy’s “Top 10” revisited[J]. Green Chem,2010,12(4):539−554. doi: 10.1039/b922014c [3] YU Z, LU X, LIU C, et al. Synthesis of γ-valerolactone from different biomass-derived feedstocks: Recent advances on reaction mechanisms and catalytic systems[J]. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev,2019,112:140−157. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.039 [4] WORSLEY C, RAPTIS D, MERONI S, et al. γ-Valerolactone: A nontoxic green solvent for highly stable printed mesoporous perovskite solar cells[J]. Energy Technol,2021,9(7):2100312−2100321. doi: 10.1002/ente.202100312 [5] ZHANG Z. Synthesis of gamma-valerolactone from carbohydrates and its applications[J]. ChemSusChem,2016,9(2):156−171. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201501089 [6] KANG S, YU J. Effect of methanol on formation of levulinates from cellulosic biomass[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res,2015,54(46):11552−11559. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03512 [7] SHAN J, WANG Q, HAO H, GUO H. Critical review on the synthesis of levulinate esters from biomass-based feedstocks and their application[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res,2023,62(42):17135−17147. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c01500 [8] NEGAHDAR L, AL-SHAAL M G, HOLZHÄUSER F J, et al. Kinetic analysis of the catalytic hydrogenation of alkyl levulinates to γ-valerolactone[J]. Chem Eng Sci,2017,158:545−551. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.11.007 [9] ZHAO D, SU T, RODRÍGUEZ-PADRÓN D, et al. Efficient transfer hydrogenation of alkyl levulinates to γ-valerolactone catalyzed by simple Zr-TiO2 metal oxide systems[J]. Mater Today Chem,2022,24:100745−100756. doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100745 [10] WANG Y, PLAZL I, VERNIÈRES-HASSIMI L, et al. From calorimetry to thermal risk assessment: γ-Valerolactone production from the hydrogenation of alkyl levulinates[J]. Process Saf Environ Prot,2020,144:32−41. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.07.017 [11] YAN K, YANG Y, CHAI J, et al. Catalytic reactions of gamma-valerolactone: A platform to fuels and value-added chemicals[J]. Appl Catal B: Environ,2015,179:292−304. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.030 [12] YU X, LIU J, RU C, et al. Lattice expansion and electronic reconfiguration of MnCu oxide catalysts for enhanced transfer hydrogenation of levulinate[J]. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng,2022,10(40):13402−13414. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c03644 [13] GONZÁLEZ G, AREA M C. An overview of the obtaining of biomass-derived gamma-valerolactone from levulinic acid or esters without H2 supply[J]. BioResources,2021,16(4):8417−8444. doi: 10.15376/biores.16.4.8417-8444 [14] GAUTAM P, NEHA, UPADHYAY S N, et al. Bio-methanol as a renewable fuel from waste biomass: Current trends and future perspective[J]. Fuel,2020,273:117783−117794. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117783 [15] 5] XIE S Q, LI Z X, LI H D, et al. Integration of carbon capture with heterogeneous catalysis toward methanol production: Chemistry, challenges, and opportunities[J]. Catal Rev: Sci Eng, 2023, 1–40. [16] REN M, ZHANG Y, WANG X, et al. Catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol: A review[J]. Catalysts,2022,12(4):403−435. doi: 10.3390/catal12040403 [17] LI Z, TANG X, JIANG Y, et al. Atom-economical synthesis of gamma-valerolactone with self-supplied hydrogen from methanol[J]. Chem Commun (Camb),2015,51(91):16320−16323. doi: 10.1039/C5CC06669G [18] TANG X, LI Z, ZENG X, et al. In situ catalytic hydrogenation of biomass-derived methyl levulinate to gamma-valerolactone in methanol[J]. ChemSusChem,2015,8(9):1601−1607. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201403392 [19] CAO X, WEI J, LIU H, et al. Hydrogenation of methyl levulinate to γ-valerolactone over Cu-Mg oxide using MeOH as in situ hydrogen source[J]. J Chem Technol Biotechnol,2019,94(1):167−177. doi: 10.1002/jctb.5759 [20] CAO X, LIU H, WEI J, et al. Effective production of γ-valerolactone from biomass-derived methyl levulinate over CuO-CaCO3 catalyst[J]. Chin J Catal,2019,40(2):192−203. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63270-5 [21] DOUTHWAITE M, ZHANG B, IQBAL S, et al. Transfer hydrogenation of methyl levulinate with methanol to gamma valerolactone over Cu-ZrO2: A sustainable approach to liquid fuels[J]. Catal Commun,2022,164:106430−106434. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2022.106430 [22] WONG C Y Y, CHOI A W-T, LUI M Y, et al. Stability of gamma-valerolactone under neutral, acidic, and basic conditions[J]. Struct Chem,2016,28(2):423−429. [23] KASAR G B, DATE N S, BHOSALE P N, et al. Steering the ester and γ-valerolactone selectivities in levulinic acid hydrogenation[J]. Energy Fuels,2018,32(6):6887−6900. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01263 [24] MAO Q L, GUO Y, LIU X H, et al. Identifying the realistic catalyst for aqueous phase reforming of methanol over Pt supported by lanthanum nickel perovskite catalyst[J]. Appl Catal B: Environ,2022,313:121435−121442. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121435 [25] WANG X, LI D, GAO Z, et al. The nature of interfacial catalysis over Pt/NiAl2O4 for hydrogen production from methanol reforming reaction[J]. J Am Chem Soc,2023,145(2):905−918. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c09437 [26] SERRA A, ARTAL R, PHILIPPE L, et al. Electrodeposited Ni-rich Ni-Pt mesoporous nanowires for selective and efficient formic acid-assisted hydrogenation of levulinic acid to gamma-valerolactone[J]. Langmuir,2021,37(15):4666−4677. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00461 [27] CHEN C-B, CHEN M-Y, ZADA B, et al. Effective conversion of biomass-derived ethyl levulinate into γ-valerolactone over commercial zeolite supported Pt catalysts[J]. RSC Adv,2016,6(113):112477−112485. doi: 10.1039/C6RA24323A [28] ZHANG S, YANG X, ZHENG K, et al. In-situ hydrogenation of furfural conversion to furfuryl alcohol via aqueous-phase reforming of methanol[J]. Appl Catal A: Gen,2019,581:103−110. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2019.05.031 [29] LV Z, ZHU S, WANG S, et al. Aqueous-phase reforming of methanol to hydrogen over CoAl oxide-supported Pt catalyst[J]. Appl Catal A: Gen,2023,665:119378−119391. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2023.119378 [30] LI D D, LI Y, LIU X H, et al. NiAl2O4 spinel supported Pt catalyst: High performance and origin in aqueous-phase reforming of methanol[J]. ACS Catal,2019,9(10):9671−9682. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b02243 [31] MADEIRA F F, TAYEB K B, PINARD L, et al. Ethanol transformation into hydrocarbons on ZSM-5 zeolites: Influence of Si/Al ratio on catalytic performances and deactivation rate. Study of the radical species role[J]. Appl Catal A: Gen,2012,443-444:171−180. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2012.07.037 [32] KONDEBOINA M, ENUMULA S S, REDDY K S, et al. Bimetallic Ni-Co/γ-Al2O3 catalyst for vapour phase production of γ-valerolactone: Deactivation studies and feedstock selection[J]. Fuel,2021,285:119094−119102. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119094 [33] REYNOSO A J, IRIARTE-VELASCO U, GUTIÉRREZ-ORTIZ M A, et al. Highly stable Pt/CoAl2O4 catalysts in aqueous-phase reforming of glycerol[J]. Catal Today,2021,367:278−289. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2020.03.039 [34] LIU X, GUO Y, XU W, et al. Catalytic properties of Pt/Al2O3 catalysts in the aqueous-phase reforming of ethylene glycol: Effect of the alumina support[J]. Kinet Catal,2011,52(6):817−822. doi: 10.1134/S0023158411060115 [35] CHEN X, ZHAO T, ZHANG X, et al. Synthesis of ternary magnetic nanoparticles for enhanced catalytic conversion of biomass-derived methyl levulinate into γ-valerolactone[J]. J Energy Chem,2021,63:430−441. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.07.013 [36] LIU Z, GAO X, LIU B, et al. Highly stable and selective layered Co-Al-O catalysts for low-temperature CO2 methanation[J]. Appl Catal B: Environ,2022,310:121303−121302. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121303 [37] GUO Y, AZMAT M U, LIU X H, et al. Effect of support's basic properties on hydrogen production in aqueous-phase reforming of glycerol and correlation between WGS and APR[J]. Appl Energy,2012,92:218−223. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.10.020 [38] NABAHO D, NIEMANTSVERDRIET J W, CLAEYS M, et al. Hydrogen spillover in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: An analysis of platinum as a promoter for cobalt-alumina catalysts[J]. Catal Today,2016,261:17−27. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.08.050 [39] SHAO Y, BA S, SUN K, et al. Selective production of γ-valerolactone or 1, 4-pentanediol from levulinic acid/esters over Co-based catalyst: Importance of the synergy of hydrogenation sites and acidic sites[J]. Chem Eng J,2022,429:132433−132447. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132433 [40] CARLSSON P, OSTERLUND L, THORMAHLEN P, et al. A transient in situ FTIR and XANES study of CO oxidation over Pt/Al2O3 catalysts[J]. J Catal,2004,226(2):422−434. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.06.009 [41] PAN Y, XU L X, HUANG L, et al. Identification of active sites in Pt-Co bimetallic catalysts for CO oxidation[J]. ACS Appl Energy Mater,2021,4(10):11151−11161. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c02049 [42] FAN G L, WANG H, XIANG X, et al. Co-Al mixed metal oxides/carbon nanotubes nanocomposite prepared via a precursor route and enhanced catalytic property[J]. J Solid State Chem,2013,197:14−22. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2012.08.016 [43] SHAO Z, ZHANG S, LIU X, et al. Maximizing the synergistic effect between Pt0 and Pt δ+ in a confined Pt-based catalyst for durable hydrogen production[J]. Appl Catal B: Environ,2022,316:121669−121680. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121669 [44] LIU Y, CHEN N, WANG F, et al. Pt-Co deposited on polyaniline-modified carbon for the electro-reduction of oxygen: The interaction between Pt–Co nanoparticles and polyaniline[J]. New J Chem,2017,41(14):6585−6592. doi: 10.1039/C7NJ00145B [45] ZHANG Z, WANG F, JIANG J, et al. LDH derived Co-Al nanosheet for lipid hydrotreatment to produce green diesel[J]. Fuel,2023,333:126341−126350. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126341 [46] BIESINGER M C, PAYNE B P, GROSVENOR A P, et al. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni[J]. Appl Surf Sci,2011,257(7):2717−2730. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 [47] HE W, HUANG L, LIU C, et al. Interfacial sites in platinum-hydroxide-cobalt hybrid nanostructures for promoting CO oxidation activity[J]. Nanoscale,2021,13(4):2593−2600. doi: 10.1039/D0NR07880H [48] YAN Z, XU Z, CHENG B, et al. Co3O4 nanorod-supported Pt with enhanced performance for catalytic HCHO oxidation at room temperature[J]. Appl Surf Sci,2017,404:426−434. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.010 [49] ARSAC F, BIANCHI D, CHOVELON J M, et al. Experimental microkinetic approach of the photocatalytic oxidation of isopropyl alcohol on TiO2. Part 1. Surface elementary steps involving gaseous and adsorbed C3H xO species[J]. J Phys Chem A,2006,110(12):4202−4212. doi: 10.1021/jp055342b -